The Determinants of Decision-making among Polish, German and Chinese Managers in Managing a Shipping Company in China

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2020.0990.0603

Keywords:

management decisions, management, entrepreneurship, human resources, shipping industry

Abstract

Objective: The article specifies the determinants of management decision-making in the shipping industry and examines the similarities and differences in decision-making by Polish, German and Chinese managers managing a shipping company.

Research Design & Methods: The research was conducted by means of direct interviews with managers from Poland, Germany and China as well as the observation of participants.

Findings: HR, planning, setting priorities and delegating tasks are necessary for effective decisions, as are balance, courage and self-confidence. Cultural differences determine the decisions taken by managers from Poland, Germany and China, who will differ in the solutions that grow out of the decisions management makes. Polish managers more often refer to financial results and decision-making freedom. German managers also count the freedom to adjust their decision-making as a vital factor, as well as the ability to make quick decisions. Chinese managers, meanwhile, more frequently indicate that planning, guidelines, avoiding conflict and good cooperation are the most important factors promoting good decision-making.

Implications/Recommendations: The key areas of managerial decisions in the industry include administration, finance, technology, shipping, safety and digitalisation. A manager’s character and system solutions are the most important factors in decision-making.

Contribution: The comparison of Polish, German and Chinese managers in the scope of their decision making in shipping companies is a new approach to the shipping industry, one that reveals new knowledge. The results will be the basis for further research and contribute to the development of the discipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acevedo M., Krueger J. I. (2004), Two Egocentric Sources of the Decision to Vote: The Voter’s Illusion and the Belief in Personal Relevance, “Political Psychology”, vol. 25, no 1, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00359.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00359.x

Bingham C. B., Eisenhardt K. M. (2011), Rational Heuristics: The Imple Rules that Strategists Learn from Process Experience, “Strategic Management Journal”, vol. 32, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.965

Brockmann E. N., Anthony W. P. (2016), Tacit Knowledge and Strategic Decision Making, “Group and Organizational Management”, vol. 27, December, https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102238356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102238356

Bruine de Bruin W., Parker A. M., Fischhoff B. (2007), Individual Differences in Adult Decision-making Competence, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, vol. 92, no 5, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938

China, Incidentally, Has Been the Global Export Leader since 2009 (2021), https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/011915/what-country-worlds-largest-exporter-goods.asp (accessed: 29.04.2021).

Dane E., Rockman K., Pratt M. (2012), When Should I Trust My Gut? Linking Domain Expertise to Intuitive Decision-making Effectiveness, Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.07.009

Davis J. P., Eisenhardt K. M., Bingham C. B. (2009), Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules, “Administrative Science Quarterly”, vol. 54, no 3, https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413

Fletcher A. C., Wagner G. A., Bourne P. E. (2020), Ten Simple Rules for Objective Decision Making, “Plos Computational Biology”, April 2, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007706

Highhouse S., Dalal R. S., Salas E. (2013), Judgment and Decision Making at Work, Routledge, New York 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203767054

Hine L. (2018), Transition Choices Emerge to Meet the IMO’s 2030 Target, “Trade Winds”, December 14.

Hine L. (2020), Shipping Makes Waves in Arctic NSR Waters while the Sun Shines, “Trade Winds”, 2 October.

Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J. (2007), Kultury i organizacje, PWE, Warszawa.

Jakubowska A., Grabowska-Powaga A. (2015), Wpływ zaufania na podejmowanie decyzji podmiotów gospodarujących na rynku, “Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Seria: Organizacja i Zarządzanie”, vol. 86.

Juliusson E., Karlsson N., Gaerling T. (2005), Weighing the Past and the Future in Decision Making, “European Journal of Cognitive Psychology”, vol. 17, no 4, https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440440000159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440440000159

Ketchen D. J. Jr, Craighead Ch. W. (2020), Research at the Intersection of Entrepreneurship, Supply Chain Management, and Strategic Management: Opportunities Highlighted by COVID-19, “Journal of Management”, vol. 46, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320945028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320945028

Kock F. (2018), Global Sulphur Cap, DNV GL, Germany, 23 May.

Kotarbiński T. (1957), Myśli o działaniu (in:) Wybór pism, t. I, PWN, Warszawa.

Matzler K., Uzelac B., Bauer F. (2014), Intuition: the Missing Ingredient for Good Managerial Decision Making, “Journal of Business Strategy”, vol. 35, no 6, https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-12-2012-0077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-12-2012-0077

Mitręga M., Choi Tsai-Ming M. (2021), How Small-and-medium Transportation Companies Handle Asymmetric Customer Relationships under COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-method Study, “Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review”, vol. 148(C), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102249

Orbeck-Nilssen K. (2020), Zero-carbon Fuel Transition Must Start Now to Achieve 2050 Goals, “Trade Winds”, 2 October.

Shenghua L., Reb J., Gigerenzer G. (2019), Ecological Rationality: Fast and Frugal Heuristics for Managerial Decision Making under Uncertainty, “Academy of Managerial Journal”, vol. 62, no 6, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0172

Simbulman C. (2020), Seafarer Key to Shipping’s Sustainable Development Goals, “Trade Winds”, 2 October.

Stanovich K. E., West R. F. (2008), On the Relative Independence of Thinking Biases and Cognitive Ability, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, vol. 94, no 4, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672

Terry J. (2007), New Techniques for Training and Motivating Your Company’s Multinational Management Team, Employment Relations Today, Willey, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ert.20140 (accessed: 20.07.2020).

Trading Economics (2021), China Exports (accessed: 19.03.2021).

Weintrab S. (2018), World’s Largest Container Shipping Group Maersk Pledges to Cut All Carbon Emissions by 2050, Electrec, December 6.

Zieleniewski J. (1969), Organizacja i zarządzanie, PWN, Warszawa.

Downloads

Published

23-07-2021

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Copp, T. (2021). The Determinants of Decision-making among Polish, German and Chinese Managers in Managing a Shipping Company in China. Krakow Review of Economics and Management Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego W Krakowie, 6(990), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2020.0990.0603