Research in Strategic Management – Reflections on Multidimensional Constructs, Mixed Methods Research and Multi-level Research

Authors

  • Katarzyna Piórkowska Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, Katedra Strategii i Metod Zarządzania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2016.0954.0607

Keywords:

strategic management, multidimensional constructs, mixed methods research, multi-level research

Abstract

The aim of the article is to extend knowledge on the directions of developing research methodology in strategic management. That aim is realised through extensive study of the literature, mainly in the following foreign journals: „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, „Organisational Research Methods”, „Business Research Quarterly”, „Academy of Management Journal”, „Strategic Organization”, „Academy of Management Review”, „Strategic Management Journal”, „Journal of Management”, „Academy of Management Review”, „Organization”. Each of these journals dealt in some capacity with the problems of research methods in management science (including strategic management) in the years 2010–2016.
The paper has five parts. The first presents general aspects of conducting research in strategic management, including the limitations and challenges. The issues connected with conceptualising constructs, especially multidimensional ones, are highlighted in the second part. The next two sections examine mixed methods research and the multi-level approach. The final section offers conclusions and recommendations on conducting research in strategic management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adcock R., Collier D. [2001], Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research, „American Political Science Review”, vol. 95(3), https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055401003100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401003100

Aguinis H., Boyd B.K., Pierce Ch.A., Short J.C. [2011], Walking New Avenues in Management Research Methods and Theories: Bridging Micro and Macro Domains, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(2), March, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310382456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310382456

Aguinis H., Pierce Ch.A., Bosco F.A., Muslin I.S. [2009], First Decade of Organizational Research Methods: Trends in Design, Measurement, and Data-analysis Topics, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 12(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108322641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108322641

Bauer D.J. [2003], Estimating Multilevel Linear Models as Structural Equation Models, „Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics”, vol. 28(2), https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986028002135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986028002135

Bergman M.M. [2010], On Concepts and Paradigms in Mixed Methods Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 4(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810376950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810376950

Bergman M.M. [2011a], The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in Mixed Methods Research and Design, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 5(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811433236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811433236

Bergman M.M. [2011b], The Politics, Fashions, and Conventions of Research Methods, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 5(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811408318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811408318

Berson Y., Avolio B.J., Kahai S. [2003], Level Specification: Using Triangulation in a Grounded Theory Approach to Construct Building [w:] Annual Review: Multi-level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Strategy, eds F.J. Yammarino, F. Dansereau, vol. 2, Elsevier Science, Oxford.

Berthod O., Grothe-Hammer M., Sydow J. [2016], Network Ethnography: A Mixed-method Approach for the Study of Practices in Interorganizational Settings, „Organizational Research Methods”, March, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116633872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116633872

Bliese P.D. [2000], Within-group Agreement, Non-independence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analyses [w:] Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, eds K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

Bliese P.D., Hanges P.J. [2004], Being Both Too Liberal and Too Conservative: The Perils of Treating Grouped Data as Though They Were Independent, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 7(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104268542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104268542

Burstein L., Linn R.L., Capell F.J. [1978], Analyzing Multilevel Data in the Presence of Heterogeneous Within-class Regressions, „Journal of Educational Statistics”, vol. 3(4), https://doi.org/10.2307/1164777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1164777

Castro S.L. [2002], Data Analytic Methods for the Analysis of Multilevel Questions: A Comparison of Intraclass Correlation Coefficients, rwg(j), Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Within- and Between-analysis, and Random Group Resampling, „The Leadership Quarterly”, vol. 13, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00105-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00105-9

Castro F.G., Kellison J.G., Boyd S.J., Kopak A. [2010], A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and Data Analyses, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 4(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810382916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810382916

Certo S.T., Sirmon D.G, Brymer R.A. [2010], Competition and Scholarly Productivity in Management: Investigating Changes in Scholarship from 1988 to 2008, „Academy of Management Learning and Education”, vol. 9(4), https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.56659878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.9.4.zqr591

Chen G., Bliese P.D., Mathieu J.E. [2005], Conceptual Framework and Statistical Procedures for Delineating and Testing Multilevel Theories of Homology, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 8(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105280056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105280056

Cording M., Christmann P., Weigelt C. [2010], Measuring Theoretically Complex Constructs: The Case of Acquisition Performance, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 8(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127009355892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127009355892

Crede E., Borrego M. [2013], From Ethnography to Items: A Mixed Methods Approach to Developing a Survey to Examine Graduate Engineering Student Retention, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 7(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812451792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812451792

Daigneault P.-M., Jacob S. [2014], Unexpected but Most Welcome: Mixed Methods for the Validation and Revision of the Participatory Evaluation Measurement Instrument, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 8(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813486190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813486190

Dalton D.R., Dalton C.M. [2011], Integration of Micro and Macro Studies in Governance Research: CEO Duality, Board Composition, and Financial Performance, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310373399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310373399

Dansereau F., Yammarino F. [2000], Within and Between Analysis: The Varient Paradigm as an Underlying Approach to Theory Building and Testing [w:] Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, eds K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

Denzin N.K. [2012], Triangulation 2.0, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186

Durand R. [2012], Advancing Strategy and Organization Research in Concert: Towards an Integrated Model?, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 10(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012453290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012453290

Dyer N.G., Hanges P.J., Hall R.J. [2005], Applying Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis Techniques to the Study of Leadership, „The Leadership Quarterly”, vol. 16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009

Edmondson A.C., McManus S.E. [2007], Methodological Fit in Management Field Research, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 32(4), https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586086

Evans B.C., Coon D.W., Ume E. [2011], Use of Theoretical Frameworks as a Pragmatic Guide for Mixed Methods Studies: A Methodological Necessity?, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 5(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811412972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811412972

Flick U. [1992], Triangulation Revisited: Strategy of Validation or Alternative?, „Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour”, vol. 22(2), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x

Flick U. [1998], An Introduction to Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, London–New Delhi.

Flick U., Garms-Homolová V., Herrmann W.J., Kuck J., Röhnsch G. [2012], “I Can’t Prescribe Something Just Because Someone Asks for It…”: Using Mixed Methods in the Framework of Triangulation, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437183

Freeman J.H. [1980], The Unit Problem in Organizational Research [w:] Frontiers in Organization and Management, ed. W.M. Evan, Praeger, New York.

Gelo O., Braakmann D., Benetka G. [2008], Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Beyond the Debate, „Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science”, vol. 42, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3

Gibson C.B. [2016], Elaboration, Generalization, Triangulation, and Interpretation: On Enhancing the Value of Mixed Method Research, „Organizational Research Methods”, April, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116639133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116639133

Goertz G., Mahoney J. [2012], A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Guerras-Martín L.Á., Madhok A., Montoro-Sánchez Á. [2014], The Evolution of Strategic Management Research: Recent Trends and Current Directions, „Business Research Quarterly”, vol. 17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2014.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2014.03.001

Guest G. [2012], Describing Mixed Methods Research: An Alternative to Typologies, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 7(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812461179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812461179

Hambrick D.C. [2004], The Disintegration of Strategic Management: It’s Time to Consolidate Our Gains, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 2(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127004040915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127004040915

Hambrick D.C. [2007], The Field of Management’s Devotion to Theory: Too Much of a Good Thing?, „Academy of Management Journal”, vol. 50(6), https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166119

Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research [2010], eds A. Tashakkori, Ch. Teddlie, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Hart L.C., Smith S.Z., Swars S.L., Smith M.E. [2009], An Examination of Research Methods in Mathematics Education (1995–2005), „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 3(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808325771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808325771

Helfat C.E. [2007], Stylized Facts, Empirical Research and Theory Development in Management, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 5(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007077559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007077559

Hill A.D., Kern D.A., White M.A. [2012], Building Understanding in Strategy Research: The Importance of Employing Consistent Terminology and Convergent Measures, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 10(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012445239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012445239

Hitt M.A., Beamish P.W., Jackson S.E., Mathieu J.E. [2007], Building Theoretical and Empirical Bridges across Levels: Multilevel Research in Management, „Academy of Management Journal”, vol. 50(6), https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166219

Hitt M.A., Boyd B.K., Li D. [2004], The State of Strategic Management Research and a Vision of the Future [w:] Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, eds D. Ketchen, D. Bergh, vol. 1, Elsevier, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-8387(04)01101-4

Hofmann D.A. [1997], An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models, „Journal of Management”, vol. 23(6), https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(97)90026-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90026-X

House R., Rousseau D.M., Thomas-Hunt M. [1995], The Meso Paradigm: A Framework for the Integration of Micro and Macro Organizational Behawior, „Research in Organizational Behavior”, vol. 17.

Howe K.R. [2012], Mixed Methods, Triangulation, and Causal Explanation, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437187

James L.R., Williams L. [2000], The Cross-level Operator in Regression, ANCOVA, and Contextual Analysis [w:] Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, And New Directions, eds K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

Jarzabkowski P., Bednarek R., Lê J.K. [2014], Producing Persuasive Findings: Demystifying Ethnographic Textwork in Strategy and Organization Research, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 12(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554575

Johnson R.B., Onwuegbuzie A.J. [2014], Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come, „Educational Researcher”, vol. 33(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014

Johnson R.B., Onwuegbuzie A.J., Turner L.A. [2007], Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 1(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

Kelle U. [2001], Sociological Explanations between Micro and Macro and the Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods [43 Paragraphs], „Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, vol. 2(1), art. 5, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114fqs010159.

Klein K.J., Cannella A., Tosi H. [1999], Multilevel Theory: Challenges and Contributions, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 24.

Kozlowski S.W.J., Klein K.J. [2000], A Multi-level Approach to Theory and Research in Organizations: Contextual, Temporal, and Emergent Processes [w:] Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, eds K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

Kozlowski S.W.J., Chao G.T., Grand J.A., Braun M.T., Kuljanin G. [2013], Advancing Multilevel Research Design: Capturing the Dynamics of Emergence, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 16(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113493119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113493119

Law K.S., Wong, C.S., Mobley W.M. [1998], Toward a Taxonomy of Multidimensional Constructs, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 23(4), https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259060

Locke E.A. [2012], Construct Validity vs. Concept Validity, „Human Resource Management Review”, vol. 22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.008

MacKenzie S.B. [2003], The Dangers of Poor Construct Conceptualization, „Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science”, vol. 31(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003011

MacKenzie S.B., Podsakoff P.M., Podsakoff N.P. [2011], Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques, „MIS Quarterly”, vol. 35(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/23044045

Mathieu J.E., Chen G. [2011], The Etiology of the Multilevel Paradigm in Management Research, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310364663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310364663

Mayoh J., Onwuegbuzie A.J. [2015], Toward a Conceptualization of Mixed Methods Phenomenological Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 9(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813505358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813505358

McKinley W. [2007], Managing Knowledge in Organization Studies through Instrumentation, „Organization”, vol. 14(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407071863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407071863

Molina-Azorín J.F. [2011], The Use and Added Value of Mixed Methods in Management Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 5(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810384490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810384490

Molina-Azorín J.F. [2012], Mixed Methods Research in Strategic Management: Impact and Applications, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 15(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110393023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110393023

Molina-Azorin J.F., Fetters M.D. [2016], Mixed Methods Research Prevalence Studies: Field-specific Studies on the State of the Art of Mixed Methods Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 10(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816636707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816636707

Molloy J.C., Chadwick C., Ployhart R.E., Golden S.J. [2011], Making Intangibles “Tangible” in Tests of Resource-based Theory: A Multidisciplinary Construct Validation Approach, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(5), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394185

Mossholder K.W., Bedeian A.G. [1983], Cross-level Inference and Organizational Research: Perspectives on Interpretation and Application, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 8(4), https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1983.4284651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258256

Netemeyer R.G., Bearden W.O., Sharma S. [2003], Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Oxley J.E., Rivkin J.W., Ryall M.D. [2010], The Strategy Research Initiative: Recognizing and Encouraging High-quality Research in Strategy, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 8(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127010387821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127010387821

Piórkowska K. [2014a], Behavioral Strategies as Micro-foundations in Strategic Management, „Global Business&Economics Anthology”, vol. 2, December.

Piórkowska K. [2014b], Micro-foundations w teorii zarządzania strategicznego – czy to tylko retoryka?, Prace Naukowe Wałbrzyskiej Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania i Przedsiębiorczości, Zarządzanie strategiczne. Rozwój koncepcji i metod, red. K. Krupski, t. 27(2), Wałbrzych.

Plano Clark V.L., Anderson N., Wertz J.A., Zhou Y., Schumacher K., Miaskowski Ch. [2015], Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs: A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 9(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814543563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814543563

Ployhart R.E., Vandenberg R.J. [2010], Longitudinal Research: The Theory, Design, and Analysis of Change, „Journal of Management”, vol. 36(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352110

Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Podsakoff N.P. [2016], Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 19(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115624965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115624965

Podsakoff N.P., Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Klinger R.L. [2013], Are We Really Measuring What We Say We’re Measuring? Using Video Techniques to Supplement Traditional Construct Validation Procedures, „Journal of Applied Psychology”, vol. 98(1), https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029570

Popper K. [2002], The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge, New York.

Powell T.C., Lovallo D., Fox C.R. [2011], Behavioral Strategy, „Strategic Management Journal”, vol. 32(13), https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.968

Ronda-Pupo G.A., Guerras-Martin L.Á. [2012], Dynamics of the Evolution of the Strategy Concept 1962–2008: A Co-Word Analysis, „Strategic Management Journal”, vol. 33(2), https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.948

Rousseau D.M. [1985], Issues of Level in Organizational Research: Multi-level and Cross-level Perspectives, „Research in Organizational Behavior”, vol. 7.

Rousseau D.M. [2011], Reinforcing the Micro/Macro Bridge: Organizational Thinking and Pluralistic Vehicles, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310372414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310372414

Shepherd D.A. [2011], Multilevel Entrepreneurship Research: Opportunities for Studying Entrepreneurial Decision Making, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310369940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310369940

Short J.C., Ketchen D.J. Jr., Bennett N., du Toit M. [2006], An Examination of Firm, Industry, and Time Effects on Performance using Random Coefficients Modeling, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 9(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106287572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106287572

Stańczyk-Hugiet E., Piórkowska K., Stańczyk S. [2016], Ewolucyjny nurt w naukach o zarządzaniu. Stan wiedzy, „Przegląd Organizacji”, nr 2.

Suddaby R. [2010], Editor’s Comments: Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 35(3), https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.51141319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok346

Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. [1998], Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Tepper B.J., Henle C.A. [2011], A Case for Recognizing Distinctions among Constructs that Capture Interpersonal Mistreatment in Work Organizations, „Journal of Organizational Behavior”, vol. 32(3), https://doi.org/10.1002/job.688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.688

Thietart R.-A. [2016], Strategy Dynamics: Agency, Path Dependency, and Self-organized Emergence, „Strategic Management Journal”, vol. 37(4), https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2368

Venkatraman N., Grant J.H. [1986], Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 11(1), https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4282628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258332

Vesa M., Vaara E. [2014], Strategic Ethnography 2.0: Four Methods for Advancing Strategy Process and Practice Research, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 12(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554745

Waldman D.A., Carter M.Z., Hom P.W. [2015], A Multilevel Investigation of Leadership and Turnover Behavior, „Journal of Management”, vol. 41(6), September, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312460679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312460679

Wheeldon J. [2010], Mapping Mixed Methods Research: Methods, Measures, and Meaning, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 4(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809358755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809358755

Wong Ch.-S., Law K.S., Huang G.-H. [2008], On the Importance of Conducting Construct-Level Analysis for Multidimensional Constructs in Theory Development and Testing, „Journal of Management”, vol. 34(4), August, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307312506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307312506

Zappa P., Lomi A. [2015], The Analysis of Multilevel Networks in Organizations: Models and Empirical Tests, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 18(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115579225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115579225

Zhang Z., Zyphur M.J., Preacher K.J. [2009], Testing Multilevel Mediation Using Hierarchical Linear Models: Problems and Solutions, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 12(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108327450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108327450

Downloads

Published

16-12-2016

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Piórkowska, K. (2016). Research in Strategic Management – Reflections on Multidimensional Constructs, Mixed Methods Research and Multi-level Research. Krakow Review of Economics and Management Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego W Krakowie, 6(954), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2016.0954.0607