From Conjoint Analysis to Menu-based Choice

Authors

  • Aneta Rybicka Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, Katedra Ekonometrii i Informatyki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/krem.735

Keywords:

revealed preference analysis, conjoint analysis, discrete choice method, adaptive conjoint analysis, adaptive discrete choice method, menu-based choice method

Abstract

One of most popular methods applied in stated preference evaluation is conjoint analysis. While doing preference evaluations with the application of conjoint analysis, a respondent is presented a set of profiles (products or services) to evaluate. Respondents are asked to rank or order profiles. While using discrete choice studies we don't ask respondents to rank or order profiles, but we present a set of profiles and ask him or her to choose either one or none of them. Preference measurement and evaluation with the application of adaptive conjoint analysis is done in two phases. The respondent evaluates preferences towards levels of all attributes, then evaluates selected pairs and chooses one profile. This method allows for the use of a large number of attributes and levels. But because of the need to choose between pairs of profiles it is different from the consumer behaviour market. To get more real-life data, an adaptive discrete choice method was proposed to describe both compensatory and non-compensatory behaviours. Menu-based choice, designed for markets where a consumer can make choices from the menu, is the newest method of preference analysis. The main aim of the paper is to describe all of the methods, starting from conjoint analysis on through to menu-based choice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACBC Technical Paper [2009], http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/acbctech.pdf (dostęp: 9.10.2012).

Adaptive Choice-based Conjoint Analysis [2003], http://pentor-arch.tnsglobal.pl/58346.xml (dostęp: 12.11.2012).

Bąk A. [2000], Możliwości wykorzystania alternatywnych algorytmów conjoint analysis w badaniach marketingowych, Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, nr 874, Wrocław.

DeSarbo W.S., Ramaswamy V. [1995], Marketing Segmentation with Choice-based Conjoint Analysis, „Marketing Letters", vol. 6, nr 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994929

Gilbride T., Allenby G.M. [2004], A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules, „Marketing Science", vol. 23, nr 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1030.0032

Green P.E., Rao V.R. [1971], Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data, „Journal of Marketing Reaserch", vol. 8, nr 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3149575

Green P.E., Srinivasan V. [1978], Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook, „Journal of Consumer Research", vol. 5, nr 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/208721

Green P.E., Wind Y. [1975], New Way to Measure Consumers' Judgments, „Harvard Business Review", July-August.

Hauser J.R. et al. [2006], „Must Have" Aspects vs. Tradeoff Aspects in Models of Customer Decisions [w:] Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference, Sequim, Washington.

Johnson R.M. [1974], Trade-off Analysis of Consumer Values, „Journal of Marketing Research", vol. 11, nr 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3150548

Johnson R.M. [2011], History of Sawtooth Softwareʼs CBC Program, http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/historyCBC.pdf (dostęp: 6.12.2012).

Krapp A., Sattler H. [2001], Rethinking Preference Measurement, http://www.henriksattler.de/publikationen/HS_046.pdf (dostęp: 10.05.2006).

Luce R.D., Turkey J.W. [1964], Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement, „Journal of Mathematical Psychology", vol. 1, nr 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-X

Optymalizacja taryf telekomunikacyjnych [2012], http://pentor.com.pl/web/tel1/tel1logn.htm (dostęp: 12.11.2012).

Orme B. [2009], A Short History of Conjoint Analysis, http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/cahistory.pdf (dostęp: 10.12.2012).

Orme B. [2010a], Menu-based Choice Modeling Using Traditional Tools, http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/mbcconf2010.pdf (dostęp: 10.10.2012).

Orme B. [2010b], Task Order Effects in Menu-Based Choice, http://www.sawtooth-software.com/download/techpap/mbcorder2010.pdf (dostęp: 10.10.2012).

Strojny J. [2003], Metoda conjoint, http://www.ar.krakow.pl/~jstrojny/Matrix/Analiza/Metody/conjoint/etapy_rozwoju.html (dostęp: 10.01.2013).

Walesiak M., Bąk A. [2000], Conjoint analysis w badaniach marketingowych, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, Wrocław.

Downloads

Published

16-12-2015

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rybicka, A. (2015). From Conjoint Analysis to Menu-based Choice. Krakow Review of Economics and Management Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego W Krakowie, 916, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.15678/krem.735