Stimulants of and Barriers to Co-operation between Entrepreneurs and Research Entities Engaging in Innovative Projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2023.1000.0203Keywords:
research and development activities, commercialisation of R&D, co-operation between research institutions and business, innovationAbstract
Objective: The aim of this paper is to identify the most important factors supporting and hindering co-operation between entrepreneurs and research entities engaging in innovative projects. Co-operation is aimed at generating technical, IT, or process innovations, while the most common partners of choice for entrepreneurs are research entities that are part of universities. Decisions concerning such co-operation should be based on three key factors: analysis of the company’s potential, forecasting of future possible outcomes and information on funding opportunities. These assumptions are the basis for diagnosing the barriers that lead to the abandonment of co-operation. Factors that facilitate such co-operation are also identified.
Research Design & Methods: A survey was conducted among business entities engaged in manufacturing and service activities with high and medium-high technologies from the Lower Silesian Voivodship. The most important factors limiting and supporting the propensity for research collaboration were then analysed with the use of descriptive statistics and statistical inference (Fisher’s test).
Findings: The research identifies barriers that should be neutralised in order to develop research co-operation between enterprises and universities. Paths to facilitating co-operation that could be developed by local and central authorities are also indicated.
Implications / Recommendations: An uncomplicated model co-operation agreement binding both parties in partnership should be developed. Attitudes in academia towards co-operation with business need to be radically changed, because researchers are primarily motivated to publish high-scoring publications in reputable journals instead of co-operating with business. Unlike researchers, entrepreneurs’ main motivation is to quickly generate cash flow. Neither side focuses on developing unique high-end innovations in co-operation with one another. There is a lack of commercialisation-oriented interaction between research entities and business. Statistical studies reveal a need for research entities to embrace the principles of business. Helping them do so will allow for the development of effective research co-operation.
Contribution: The article is intended to broaden the knowledge of the current state of co-operation between entrepreneurs and scientific institutions and to lay out recommendations for developing research co-operation.
Downloads
References
Bartosińska D., Jankiewicz-Siwek A. (2006), Metoda reprezentacyjna i jej wybrane zastosowania w badaniach społeczno-gospodarczych, “Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio H. Oeconomia”, vol. 40.
Canestrino R., Carayannis E. G., Magliocca P. (2022), The Noncontextual Drivers of Innovation: Development and Validation of the 5H-INN Survey, “IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management”, https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3159373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3159373
Chiarini A., Belvedere V., Grando A. (2020), Industry 4.0 Strategies and Technological Developments. An Exploratory Research from Italian Manufacturing Companies, “Production Planning & Control”, vol. 31(16), https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1710304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1710304
Cichosz M., Wallenburg C. M., Knemeyer A. M. (2020), Digital Transformation at Logistics Service Providers: Barriers, Success Factors and Leading Practices, “The International Journal of Logistics Management”, vol. 31(2), http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229
Cinar E., Trott P., Simms C. (2019), A Systematic Review of Barriers to Public Sector Innovation Process, “Public Management Review”, vol. 21(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477
Conlé M., Kroll H., Storz C., Brink T. ten (2023), University Satellite Institutes as Exogenous Facilitators of Technology Transfer Ecosystem Development, “The Journal of Technology Transfer”, vol. 48, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09909-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09909-7
Dagnino G. B., Picone P. M., Ferrigno G. (2021), Temporary Competitive Advantage: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review and Research Directions, “International Journal of Management Reviews”, vol. 23(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12242
Fischer B., Guerrero M., Guimón J., Schaeffer P. R. (2021), Knowledge Transfer for Frugal Innovation: Where Do Entrepreneurial Universities Stand?, “Journal of Knowledge Management”, vol. 25(2), https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0040
García-Quevedo J., Segarra-Blasco A., Teruel M. (2018), Financial Constraints and the Failure of Innovation Projects, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.029
Godina R., Ribeiro I., Matos F., Ferreira B. T., Carvalho H., Peças P. (2020), Impact Assessment of Additive Manufacturing on Sustainable Business Models in Industry 4.0 Context, “Sustainability”, vol. 12(17), https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177066
Gontareva I., Litvinov O., Hrebennyk N., Nebaba N., Litvinova V., Chimshir A. (2022), Improvement of the Innovative Ecosystem at Universities, “Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies”, vol. 1(13(115)), https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.251799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.251799
Hájek P., Stejskal J. (2018), R&D Cooperation and Knowledge Spillover Effects for Sustainable Business Innovation in the Chemical Industry, “Sustainability”, vol. 10(4), https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041064
Heaton S., Lewin D., Teece D. J. (2020), Managing Campus Entrepreneurship: Dynamic Capabilities and University Leadership, “Managerial and Decision Economics”, vol. 41(6), https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3015
Heaton S., Siegel D. S., Teece D. J. (2019), Universities and Innovation Ecosystems: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective, “Industrial and Corporate Change”, vol. 28(4), https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz038
Huber F., Wainwright T., Rentocchini F. (2020), Open Data for Open Innovation: Managing Absorptive Capacity in SMEs, “R&D Management”, vol. 50(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12347
Isaksen A., Trippl M., Kyllingstad N., Rypestøl J. O. (2021), Digital Transformation of Regional Industries through Asset Modification, “Competitiveness Review”, vol. 31(1), https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-12-2019-0140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-12-2019-0140
Jakimowicz A., Rzeczkowski D. (2019), Diversification of Innovation Strategies of Polish Industrial Processing Enterprises Depending on Their Size after the Global Financial Crisis, “Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation”, vol. 15(4), https://doi.org/10.7341/20191542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7341/20191542
Kiefer C. P., Río González P. del, Carrillo-Hermosilla J. (2019), Drivers and Barriers of Eco-innovation Types for Sustainable Transitions: A Quantitative Perspective, “Business Strategy and the Environment”, vol. 28(1), https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2246
Lee S. M., Trimi S. (2021), Convergence Innovation in the Digital Age and in the COVID-19Pandemic Crisis, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.041
Medda G. (2020), External R&D, Product and Process Innovation in European Manufacturing Companies, “The Journal of Technology Transfer”, vol. 45(1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9682-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9682-4
Oeij P. R. A., Torre W. van der, Vaas F., Dhondt S. (2019), Understanding Social Innovation as an Innovation Process: Applying the Innovation Journey Model, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.028
Opršal Z., Harmáček J., Vítová P., Syrovátka M., Jarecka-Stępień K. (2021), Polish and Czech Foreign Aid: A ‘Mélange’of Geopolitical and Developmental Objectives, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, vol. 24, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00192-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00192-x
Parker R., Lundgren P. (2022), The Role of Universities in Transformative Innovation Policy, “Science and Public Policy”, vol. 49(2), https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab070
Raposo M., Fernandes C. I., Veiga P. M. (2022), We Dreamed a Dream That Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Can Promote Sustainability, “Management of Environmental Quality”, vol. 33(1), https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2021-0010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2021-0010
Roh T., Lee K., Yang J. Y. (2021), How Do Intellectual Property Rights and Government Support Drive a Firm’s Green Innovation? The Mediating Role of Open Innovation, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128422
Rosli A., Cacciolatti L. (2022), The Role of Universities in the Development of the Local Knowledge Base: Supporting Innovation Ecosystems through Skills Development and Entrepreneurship, “International Journal of Intellectual Property Management”, vol. 12(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2022.121018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2022.121018
Shyrokykh K. (2022), European Development Co-operation via Technical Assistance: An Outside-in Perspective, “JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13420
Smith G., Sochor J., Karlsson I. M. (2019), Public–private Innovation: Barriers in the Case of Mobility as a Service in West Sweden, “Public Management Review”, vol. 21(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1462399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1462399
Staniulyte J. (2022), Towards the Entrepreneurial University: The Principal-agent Problem, “Quality & Quantity”, vol. 56(5), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01246-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01246-z
Steen M., Hansen G. H. (2018), Barriers to Path Creation: The Case of Offshore Wind Power in Norway, “Economic Geography”, vol. 94(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953
Szücs F. (2018), Research Subsidies, Industry–university Cooperation and Innovation, “Research Policy”, vol. 47(7), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009
Vargo S. L., Akaka M. A., Wieland H. (2020), Rethinking the Process of Diffusion in Innovation: A Service-ecosystems and Institutional Perspective, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.038
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie / Cracow Review of Economics and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.