The Consensus on Economic Policy in an Emerging Economy: Evidence from the Cracow University of Economics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2014.0925.0101Keywords:
consensus, attitudes, economists' opinions, emerging market economies, economic policy, Cracow University of EconomicsAbstract
Both the recent financial crisis and the global recession vividly demonstrated the deficiencies in the economic theory. The main challenges faced by economists are to determine the economic role the state is to play and the particular features of its economic policy. The authors set out to determine the level of consensus on the above subjects among faculty members employed at the Cracow University of Economics (CUE). The research has been narrowed down to issues in the economic policies of emerging market economies (e.g. Poland). A survey containing 30 propositions was conducted in May and June 2011 in six departments of the CUE and covered fiscal, monetary, social, exchange-rate, trade, and regulatory policies. Analysis of the data collected enabled the authors to evaluate the level of consensus in each area and consequently, in a comprehensive manner, to discuss the relative convergence of opinions. The authors concluded that there is generally a significant level of consensus among participants, but the on-going redefinition of views on macroeconomic policies should also be noted.Downloads
References
Alston R., Kearl J., Vaughn M. [1992], Is There a Consensus among Economists in the 1990's? „American Economic Review", nr 82.
Baruch Y. [1999], Response Rate in Academic Studies - A Comparative Analysis, „Human Relations", vol. 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905200401
Blanchard O., Dell'Ariccia G., Mauro P. [2010], Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy, „IMF Staff Position Note", nr SPN/10/03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781455224982.004.A001
Colander D. [2009], The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure of Academic Economics, „Kiel Working Papers", nr 1489.
Consensus and Dissension among Economists: An Empirical Inquiry [1984], B. Frey, W. Pommerehne, F. Schneider, G. Guy „American Economic Review", nr 74.
De Grauwe P. [2010], The Scientific Foundation of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Models, „Public Choice", vol. 144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9674-x
Fuller D., Geide-Stevenson D. [2003], Consensus among Economists: Revisited, „Journal of Economic Education", vol. 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480309595230
Kearl J., Pope C., Whiting G., Wimmer L. [1979], What Economists Think: A Confusion of Economists, „American Economic Review", nr 69.
Kelly W. [1981], A Generalized Interpretation of the Herfindahl Index, „Southern Economic Journal", vol. 48, nr 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1058595
Krugman P. [2009], How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? „The New York Times", 2 September.
Leet D., Lang N. [2010], Consensus among Economics Teachers from Transition Economies, „The Journal of Economic Education", vol. 41(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480903238057
Mankiw N.G. [2008], What Would Have Keynes Done? „The New York Times", 30 November.
Sachs J. [2009], Rethinking Macroeconomics, „Capitalism and Society", vol. 4, nr 3, Article 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0213.1065
Whaples R. [1995], Where Is There Consensus among American Economic Historians? „Journal of Economic History", vol. 55(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700040602
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Cracow Review of Economics and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
