Statistical Measures of Affluence: Macroregions in Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2022.0995.0102Keywords:
income, affluence measures, income polarisation, affluenceIndex package, macroregions in PolandAbstract
Objective: The paper presents an analysis of the affluence in macroregions of Poland based on statistical measures of income distribution.
Research Design & Methods: The analysis uses a group of measures based on the distribution of income in the population studied. The measures characterise a given population in terms of the extent and / or intensity of its affluence. Income inequality and income polarisation are also analysed. All computations are based on European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) from 2018.
Findings: Income affluence is very differentiated across Poland’s macroregions. The Mazowieckie voivodeship macroregion has the highest share of the affluent. All of the other affluence measures likewise show this region to be the most affluent.
Implications / Recommendations: Basic measures of income inequality and polarisation give a good initial picture of income affluence but obtaining detailed information about this phenomenon is possible thanks to specific measures of the extent and intensity of income affluence. The results show that affluence is highly differentiated in Poland. Poland’s government would be well-advised to take appropriate measures to encourage entrepreneurs to invest capital in less affluent macroregions.
Contribution: The research conducted in this paper shows how to analyse the affluence in subpopulations taking into account the distribution of income. Analysis of income affluence fills the gap in income analyses focusing most of all on poverty. All the statistica measures used provide knowledge about how the affluent greatly influence the economy, policy, and other aspects of life.
Downloads
References
Alfons A., Templ M. (2013), Estimation of Social Exclusion Indicators from Complex Surveys: The R Package Laeken, “Journal of Statistical Software”, vol. 54(15), https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v054.i15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v054.i15
Alichi A., Kantenga K., Solé J. (2016), Income Polarization in the United States, IMF Working Paper no. WP/16/121, Washington, DC, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2882555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475522501.001
Atkinson T., Cantillon B., Marlier E., Nolan B. (2002), Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion, Oxford University Press, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199253498.001.0001
Bach S., Corneo G., Steiner V. (2009), From Bottom to Top: The Entire Income Distribution in Germany, 1992–2003, “Review of Income and Wealth”, vol. 55(2), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00317.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00317.x
Berihuete A., Ramos C. D., Sordo M. A. (2018), rtip: Inequality, Welfare and Poverty Indices and Curves Using the EU-SILC Data, R package version 1.1.1, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rtip (accessed: 10.02.2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-029
Bose A., Chakravarty S. R., D’Ambrosio C. (2014), Richness Orderings, “The Journal of Economic Inequality”, vol. 12(1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-013-9249-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-013-9249-4
Brzeziński M. (2010), Income Affluence in Poland, “Social Indicators Research”, vol. 99(2), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9580-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9580-0
Chakravarty S. R. (1983), A New Index of Poverty, “Mathematical Social Sciences”, vol. 6(3), https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(83)90064-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(83)90064-1
Danziger S., Gottschalk P., Smolensky E. (1989), How the Rich Have Fared, 1973–1987, “American Economic Review”, vol. 79(2).
Di Maggio F., Romanowski P., Walter C. (2003), Eastern European Banking Matures, “The McKinsey Quarterly”, no. 2.
Eurostat (2018), Glossary: Equivalised Disposable Income, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Equivalised_disposable_income (accessed: 7.11.2020).
Feenberg D. R., Poterba J. M. (2000), The Income and Tax Share of Very High-income Households, 1960–1995, “American Economic Review”, vol. 90(2), https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.264
Foster J., Greer J., Thorbecke E. (1984), A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures, “Econometrica”, vol. 52(3), https://doi.org/10.2307/1913475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913475
Franzini M., Granaglia E., Raitano M. (2016), Extreme Inequalities in Contemporary Capitalism. Should We Be Concerned about the Rich?, Springer, Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28811-6
Godechot O. (2012), Is Finance Responsible for the Rise in Wage Inequality in France?, “Socio-Economic Review”, vol. 10(3), https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mws003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mws003
Grabka M., Frick J. (2008), The Shrinking German Middle Class – Signs of Long-term Polarization in Disposable Income?, “DIW Berlin Weekly Report”, vol. 4(4).
GUS (2019), Dochody i warunki życia ludności Polski – raport z badania EU-SILC 2018 [Incomes and Living Conditions of the Population of Poland – Report from the EU-SILC Survey of 2018], GUS, Warszawa.
Haughton J., Khandker S. R. (2009), Handbook on Poverty and Inequality, The World Bank, Washington.
Hutton R. (2006), Rich Spurn Ultra Luxury Cars, “The Sunday Times”, November 5.
KPMG (2019), Rynek dóbr luksusowych w Polsce. Luksus przez pokolenia [The Luxury Goods Market in Poland. Luxury for Generations], KPMG, https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pl/pdf/2019/12/pl-raport-kpmg-w-polsc-pt-rynek-dobr-luksusowych-w-polsce-2019.pdf (accessed: 28.11.2020).
Kucharska P. (2020), Ocena skuteczności programu „Rodzina 500+” w zakresie ograniczenia ubóstwa i zwiększenia dzietności w Polsce [The Effectiveness of Poland’s “Family 500+” Programme in Terms of Reducing Poverty and Increasing the Fertility Rate], “Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie”, vol. 5(989), https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2020.0989.0505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2020.0989.0505
Leigh A. (2009), Top Incomes (in:) Handbook of Economic Inequality, W. Salverda, B. Nolan, T. Smeeding (eds), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lewkowicz-Grzegorczyk K. A. (2021), The Concept of Fairness as a Criterion for the Assessment of the Personal Income Tax in Poland, “Optimum. Economic Studies”, vol. 106(4), https://doi.org/10.15290/oes.2021.04.106.07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/oes.2021.04.106.07
Medeiros M. (2006), The Rich and the Poor: The Construction of an Affluence Line from the Poverty Line, “Social Indicators Research”, vol. 78(1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-7156-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-7156-1
Peichl A., Schaefer T., Scheicher C. (2010), Measuring Richness and Poverty: A Micro Data Application to Europe and Germany, “Review of Income and Wealth”, vol. 56(3), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2010.00404.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2010.00404.x
Pessoa D., Damico A., Jacob G. (2021), convey: Income Concentration Analysis with Complex Survey Samples, R package version 0.2.3, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=convey (accessed: 10.02.2022).
Piketty T., Saez E. (2003), Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 118(1), https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535135
Radziukiewicz M. (2006), Zasięg ubóstwa w Polsce [The Extent of Poverty in Poland], PWE, Warszawa.
Research Institute (2020), Global Wealth Report 2020, Credit Suisse Research Institute, https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/research/publications/global-wealth-report-2020-en.pdf (accessed: 30.11.2020).
Sączewska-Piotrowska A. (2015), Identyfikacja determinant bogactwa dochodowego z zastosowaniem modelu logitowego [Identification of Determinants of Income Richness Using Logistic Regression Model], “Zarządzanie i Finanse”, vol. 4(2).
Sączewska-Piotrowska A. (2018), Zamożność dochodowa gospodarstw domowych. Determinanty, dynamika, zróżnicowanie przestrzenne [Income Affluence of Households. Determinants, Dynamics, Spatial Differentiation], Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Katowice.
Sen A. K. (1997), On Economic Inequality. Expanded Edition with a Substantial Annexe by J. E. Foster and A. Sen, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Serwacki J. (2020), Danina solidarnościowa – ile prawdy, ile mistyfikacji [Solidarity Levy – How Much Truth, How Much Mystification] (in:) W poszukiwaniu dobra wspólnego Polaków: część 1, Ł. Ospara (ed.), Art Foto Ecoformat Robert Bogudziński, Lublin.
Törmälehto V.-M. (2017), High Income and Affluence: Evidence from the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), Statistical Working Papers, European Union, Brussels, https://doi.org/10.2785/611164.
Wolfson M. C. (1994), When Inequalities Diverge, “The American Economic Review”, vol. 84(2).
Wolny-Dominiak A., Sączewska-Piotrowska A. (2021), affluenceIndex: Affluence Indices, R package version 2.0, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=affluenceIndex (accessed: 10.02.2022).
Zeileis A. (2014), ineq: Measuring Inequality, Concentration, and Poverty, R package version 0.2-13, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ineq (accessed: 10.02.2022).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie / Cracow Review of Economics and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
