The Relationships between Social Security Funds and Macroeconomic Changes. An Empirical Analysis of the EU-CEE Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2022.0995.0101Keywords:
security, growth, unemployment, inflation, GrangerAbstract
Objective: This paper investigates whether and which of a set of macroeconomic variables may be a Granger cause for changes in the financing of the social security sector, and vice versa.
Research Design & Methods: Descriptive statistics, the bootstrap panel Granger causality test, and Pesaran CD test for cross-sectional dependence in panels and Pesaran’s CIPS test for unit roots in panels were applied. Panel data of the CEE countries, which are members of the European Union, was used. The research period was 2000–2019.
Findings: It was determined that lagged values of macroeconomic indicators can improve forecasting of social security sector expenditure. In turn, understanding the social security sector’s expenditure may contribute to better forecasting of the macroeconomic indicators considered for the research.
Implications / Recommendations: Maintaining stable economic growth may contribute to the financial stability of the social security system.
Contribution: The research is the first to refer to the financing of the social security sector. The study provides a framework that takes full account of the main elements of social security systems and associates them with the most significant macroeconomic indicators.
Downloads
References
Afonso A., Rault C. (2009), Bootstrap Panel Granger-causality between Government Spending and Revenue in the EU, William Davidson Institute Working Paper no. 944, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1488334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1488334
Auerbach A. J., Gale W. G., Harris B. H. (2010), Activist Fiscal Policy, “The Journal of Economic Perspectives”, vol. 24(4), available at https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.24.4.141 (accessed: 5.05.2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.4.141
Bellettini G., Ceroni C. B. (1999), Is Social Security Really Bad for Growth?, “Review of Economic Dynamics”, vol. 2(4), https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.1998.0050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.1998.0050
Bhattarai K. (2016), Unemployment–inflation Trade-offs in OECD Countries, “Economic Modelling”, vol. 58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.007
Bruno M., Easterly W. (1998), Inflation Crises and Long-run Growth, “Journal of Monetary Economics”, vol. 41(1), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(97)00063-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(97)00063-9
Cahuc P., Zylberberg A. (2004), Labor Economics, MIT Press Books, Cambridge.
Cammeraat E. (2020), The Relationship between Different Social Expenditure Schemes and Poverty, Inequality and Economic Growth, “International Social Security Review”, vol. 73(2), https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12236
Cloyne J. (2013), Discretionary Tax Changes and the Macroeconomy: New Narrative Evidence from the United Kingdom, “American Economic Review”, vol. 103(4), https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.4.1507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.4.1507
Connolly M., Li C. (2016), Government Spending and Economic Growth in the OECD Countries, “Journal of Economic Policy Reform”, vol. 19(4), https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2016.1213168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2016.1213168
Croissant Y., Millo G. (2008), Panel Data Econometrics in R: The plm Package, “Journal of Statistical Software”, vol. 27(2), https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i02
Cuaresma J. C. (2003), Okun’s Law Revisited, “Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics”, vol. 65(4), https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00056
Dumitrescu E.-I., Hurlin C. (2012), Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels, “Economic Modelling”, vol. 29(4), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Esping-Andersen G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford University Press, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198742002.001.0001
Gechert S. (2015), What Fiscal Policy Is Most Effective? A Meta-regression Analysis, “Oxford Economic Papers”, vol. 67(3), https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpv027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpv027
Gechert S., Paetz C., Villanueva P. (2021), The Macroeconomic Effects of Social Security Contributions and Benefits, “Journal of Monetary Economics”, vol. 117(C), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2020.03.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2020.03.012
Keynes J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan and Co, London.
Lambrecht S., Michel P., Vidal J.-P. (2005), Public Pensions and Growth, “European Economic Review”, vol. 49(5), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.09.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.09.009
Lindert P. H. (2004a), Growing Public. Social Spending and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century, vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510717
Lindert P. H. (2004b), Growing Public. Social Spending and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510717
Lopez L., Weber S. (2017), Testing for Granger Causality in Panel Data, IRENE Working Papers no. 17-03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1701700412
Manage N., Marlow M. L. (1986), The Causal Relation between Federal Expenditures and Receipts, “Southern Economic Journal”, vol. 52(3), https://doi.org/10.2307/1059261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1059261
Mankiw N. G., Taylor M. P. (2014), Macroeconomics. European Edition, 2nd ed., W.H. Freeman, New York.
Mineshima A., Poplawski-Ribeiro M., Weber A. (2014), Size of Fiscal Multipliers (in:) Post-Crisis Fiscal Policy, C. Cottarelli, P. Gerson, A. Senhadji (eds), MIT Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027182.003.0018
Musgrave R. A., Musgrave P. B. (1989), Public Finance in Theory and Practice, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Peacock A., Scott A. (2000), The Curious Attraction of Wagner’s Law, “Public Choice”, vol. 102(1–2), https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005032817804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005032817804
Pesaran M. H. (2004), General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, CESifo Working Paper no. 1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504
Pesaran M. H. (2007), A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-section Dependence, “Journal of Applied Econometrics”, vol. 22(2), https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Samudram M., Nair M., Vaithilingam S. (2009), Keynes and Wagner on Government Expenditures and Economic Development: the Case of a Developing Economy, “Empirical Economics”, vol. 36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-008-0214-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0264-z
Smith A. (1812), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vol. 3, Printed for Cadell and Davies, London.
Tanzi V. (2015), Hayek and the Economic Role of the State: Some Comparison with Keynes’ Views (in:) Europe, Switzerland and the Future of Freedom. Essays in Honour of Tito Tettamanti, K. Hummler, A. Mingardi (eds), IBL Libri, Torino.
Zagler M. (2004), On the Causality between Economic Growth and Unemployment (in:) Growth and Employment in Europe, Palgrave Macmillan, London, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230506329_8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230506329
Zhang J., Zhang J. (2014), How Does Social Security Affect Economic Growth? Evidence from Cross-Country Data, “Journal of Population Economics”, vol. 17(3), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-004-0198-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-004-0198-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie / Cracow Review of Economics and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
