The Review of Applications of Decision-making Techniques in Supply Chain Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15678/krem.18725Keywords:
multi-criteria decision-making, supply chain management, systematic literature review, decision-making techniquesAbstract
Objective: The objective of the article is to provide a systematic literature review of Multi-criteria Decision-making (MCDM) techniques in supply chain and logistics management. It aims to fill a research gap by offering an objective overview of the latest advancements in decision-making techniques and their impact on supply chain performance.
Research Design & Methods: The paper employs a systematic literature review to examine the application MCDM techniques in supply chain management. The review follows a five-step process: 1) formulation of research questions, 2) identification of relevant studies through the Scopus database, focusing on English-language journal articles published between 2006 and 2023, 3) selection and evaluation of studies using structured keyword searches and content screening, resulting in a final sample of 348 peer-reviewed articles, 4) analysis and synthesis of the selected literature in relation to the research questions, and 5) reporting the findings to identify research gaps and suggest future research directions.
Findings: The review reveals the diverse applications of MCDM tools and models in addressing complex supply chain challenges, including demand forecasting, inventory management, distribution optimisation, and risk assessment. Furthermore, the study underscores the substantial value added by these techniques, as they lead to improved decision-making processes, enhanced operational efficiency, cost reduction, and overall performance optimisation of supply chains. The findings also provide valuable recommendations for future research, promoting knowledge accumulation and creation in the field of MCDM techniques for supply chain management.
Implications / Recommendations: The study’s findings have important implications for supply chain management, demonstrating how MCDM methodologies may improve decision-making, efficiency, and performance. The recommendations emphasise the continuous application and research of these strategies in diverse supply chain contexts. Future research is recommended to better understand and broaden the use of MCDM approaches in supply chain settings.
Contribution: This article is unique in that it provides a full examination of MCDM strategies related to supply chain and logistics management. It synthesises a wide variety of previous research to offer a comprehensive overview of the present status and promise of MCDM approaches for improving supply chain operations and results.
Downloads
References
Abdel-Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Gamal, A., & Smarandache, F. (2018). A Hybrid Approach of Neutrosophic Sets and DEMATEL Method for Developing Supplier Selection Criteria. Design Automation for Embedded Systems, 22, 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10617-018-9203-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10617-018-9203-6
Abdirad, H., & Dossick, C. S. (2016). BIM Curriculum Design in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Education: A Systematic Review. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 21(17), 250–271.
Ali, I., Charles, V., Modibbo, U. M., Gherman, T., & Gupta, S. (2024). Navigating COVID-19: Unraveling Supply Chain Disruptions through Best-worst Method and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(5), 1548–1589. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2022-0708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2022-0708
Althaqafi, T. (2023). Cultivating Sustainable Supply Chain Practises in Electric Vehicle Manufacturing: A MCDM Approach to Assessing GSCM Performance. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 14(10), 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj14100290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj14100290
Ansari, Z. N., & Kant, R. (2017). A State-of-art Literature Review Reflecting 15 Years of Focus on Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2524–2543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.023
Ayhan, M. B. (2013). A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Gear Motor Company. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains, 4(3), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1311.2886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmvsc.2013.4302
Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating Sustainability into Supplier Selection with Grey System and Rough Set Methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.023
Banasik, A., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., Kanellopoulos, A., Claassen, G. D. H., & van der Vorst, J. G. (2018). Multi-criteria Decision Making Approaches for Green Supply Chains: A Review. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 30, 366–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-016-9263-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-016-9263-5
Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A State-of-the-art Survey of TOPSIS Applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051–13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A Novel Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy ANP and Fuzzy TOPSIS to Evaluate Green Suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000–3011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162
Celik, E., Gumus, A. T., & Erdogan, M. (2016). A New Extension of the ELECTRE Method Based upon Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets for Green Logistic Service Providers Evaluation. Evaluation, 44(5), 1813–1827. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140046
Chaharsooghi, S. K., & Ashrafi, M. (2014). Sustainable Supplier Performance Evaluation and Selection with Neofuzzy TOPSIS Method. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014, 34168. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/434168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/434168
Chai, J., Liu, J. N., & Ngai, E. W. (2013). Application of Decision-making Techniques in Supplier Selection: A Systematic Review of Literature. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3872–3885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040
Chang, B., Chang, C.-W., & Wu, C.-H. (2011). Fuzzy DEMATEL Method for Developing Supplier Selection Criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1850–1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.114
Cheng, S., Jianfu, S., Alrasheedi, M., Saeidi, P., Mishra, A. R., & Rani, P. (2021). A New Extended VIKOR Approach Using q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets for Sustainable Enterprise Risk Management Assessment in Manufacturing Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 23, 1347–1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-01024-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-01024-3
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a Systematic Review. In: D. A. Buchanan, A. Bryman (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (pp. 671–689). Sage Publications Ltd.
Dhull, S., & Narwal, M. S. (2018). Prioritizing the Drivers of Green Supply Chain Management in Indian Manufacturing Industries Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method: Government, Industry, Environment, and Public Perspectives. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 2(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-017-0030-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-017-0030-1
Freeman, J., & Chen, T. (2015). Green Supplier Selection Using an AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS Framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-04-2014-0142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-04-2014-0142
Giri, B. C., Molla, M. U., & Biswas, P. (2022). Pythagorean Fuzzy DEMATEL Method for Supplier Selection in Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Expert Systems with Applications, 193, 116396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116396
Govindan, K. (2013). Vendor-managed Inventory: A Review Based on Dimensions. International Journal of Production Research, 51(13), 3808–3835. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.751511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.751511
Govindan, K., Kadziński, M., Ehling, R., & Miebs, G. (2019). Selection of a Sustainable Third-party Reverse Logistics Provider Based on the Robustness Analysis of an Outranking Graph Kernel Conducted with ELECTRE I and SMAA. Omega, 85, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.05.007
Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Vafadarnikjoo, A. (2015). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Based DEMATEL Method for Developing Green Practices and Performances in a Green Supply Chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(20), 7207–7220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.030
Grida, M., Mohamed, R., & Zaid, A. H. (2020). A Novel Plithogenic MCDM Framework for Evaluating the Performance of IoT Based Supply Chain. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 33(1), 323–341.
Hahn, G. J., Brandenburg, M., & Becker, J. (2021). Valuing Supply Chain Performance within and across Manufacturing Industries: A DEA-based Approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 108203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108203
Hsu, C.-W., Kuo, T.-C., Chen, S.-H., & Hu, A. H. (2013). Using DEMATEL to Develop a Carbon Management Model of Supplier Selection in Green Supply Chain Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.012
Junior, M. L., & Godinho Filho, M. (2010). Variations of the Kanban System: Literature Review and Classification. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.009
Kaur, J., Sidhu, R., Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S., & Goyal, S. (2018). A DEMATEL Based Approach for Investigating Barriers in Green Supply Chain Management in Canadian Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1395522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1395522
Khan, S. A., Chaabane, A., & Dweiri, F. T. (2018). Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods Application in Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature. In: V. A. P. Salomon (Ed.), Multi-criteria Methods and Techniques Applied to Supply Chain Management. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74067
Khan, S., Kaushik, M. K., Kumar, R., & Khan, W. (2023a). Investigating the Barriers of Blockchain Technology Integrated Food Supply Chain: A BWM Approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(3), 713–735. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0489
Khan, W., Khan, S., Dhamija, A., Haseeb, M., & Ansari, S. A. (2023b). Risk Assessment in Livestock Supply Chain Using the MCDM Method: A Case of Emerging Economy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(8), 20688–20703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23640-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23640-2
Liao, C.-N., & Kao, H.-P. (2011). An Integrated Fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP Approach to Supplier Selection in Supply Chain Management. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 10803–10811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.031
Liu, J., Gu, B., & Chen, J. (2023). Enablers for Maritime Supply Chain Resilience during Pandemic: An Integrated MCDM Approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 175, 103777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103777
Manucharyan, H. (2021). Multi-criteria Decision Making for Supplier Selection: A Literature Critique. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(1), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i1.1265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i1.1265
Min, H. (2010). Artificial Intelligence in Supply Chain Management: Theory and Applications. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 13(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560902736537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560902736537
Moeinzadeh, P., & Hajfathaliha, A. (2009). A Combined Fuzzy Decision Making Approach to Supply Chain Risk Assessment. International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 3(12), 1631–1647.
Moharamkhani, A., Bozorgi-Amiri, A., & Mina, H. (2017). Supply Chain Performance Measurement Using SCOR Model Based on Interval-valued Fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 27(1), 115–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2017.083225
Najmi, A., & Makui, A. (2010). Providing Hierarchical Approach for Measuring Supply Chain Performance Using AHP and DEMATEL Methodologies. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 1(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.02.008
Oly Ndubisi, N., Jantan, M., Cha Hing, L., & Salleh Ayub, M. (2005). Supplier Selection and Management Strategies and Manufacturing Flexibility. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390510592003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390510592003
Raisinghani, M. S., & Meade, L. L. (2005). Strategic Decisions in Supply-chain Intelligence Using Knowledge Management: An Analytic-network-process Framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540510589188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540510589188
Rajak, S., Parthiban, P., & Dhanalakshmi, R. (2021). A DEA Model for Evaluation of Efficiency and Effectiveness of Sustainable Transportation Systems: A Supply Chain Perspective. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 40(2), 220–241. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2021.118737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2021.118737
Rajasekaran, K. G., Bhaskar, G. B., Chandrasekaran, M., & Murali, S. (2016). A Review on Employing Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Supplier Selection. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(6), 802–810. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7315.2016.00245.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7315.2016.00245.8
Reich, J., Wakolbinger, T., & Kinra, A. (2020). Development of a Decision Support Model for Managing Supply Chain Design Problems in Global Service Supply Chains. In: M. Freitag, H.-D. Haasis, H. Kotzab, J. Pannek (Eds), Dynamics in Logistics: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference LDIC 2020, Bremen, Germany (pp. 299–308). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44783-0_29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44783-0_29
Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2016). A Supplier Selection Life Cycle Approach Integrating Traditional and Environmental Criteria Using the Best Worst Method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.125
Ross, A., & Droge, C. (2002). An Integrated Benchmarking Approach to Distribution Center Performance Using DEA Modeling. Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00087-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00087-0
Sahoo, S. K., & Goswami, S. S. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Multiple Criteria Decision-making (MCDM) Methods: Advancements, Applications, and Future Directions. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.31181/dma1120237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/dma1120237
Salomon, V. (Ed.). (2018). Multi-criteria Methods and Techniques Applied to Supply Chain Management. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71296
Sarkis, J., & Talluri, S. (2002). A Model for Strategic Supplier Selection. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(4), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00117.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00117.x
Saroha, M., Garg, D., & Luthra, S. (2022). Identification and Analysis of Circular Supply Chain Management Practices for Sustainability: A Fuzzy-DEMATEL Approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(3), 722–747. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2020-0613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2020-0613
Senvar, O., Tuzkaya, U. R., & Kahraman, C. (2014). Supply Chain Performance Measurement: An Integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy-ANP Approach. In: C. Kahraman, B. Öztayşi (Eds), Supply Chain Management under Fuzziness: Recent Developments and Techniques (pp. 143–165). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53939-8_7
Shemshadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M., & Tarokh, M. J. (2011). A Fuzzy VIKOR Method for Supplier Selection Based on Entropy Measure for Objective Weighting. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12160–12167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.027
Tsai, J. F., Shen, S. P., & Lin, M. H. (2023). Applying a Hybrid MCDM Model to Evaluate Green Supply Chain Management Practices. Sustainability, 15(3), 2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032148
Tyagi, M., Kumar, P., & Kumar, D. (2014). A Hybrid Approach Using AHP-TOPSIS for Analyzing e-SCM Performance. Procedia Engineering, 97, 2195–2203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.463 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.463
Yasmin, M., Tatoglu, E., Kilic, H. S., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2020). Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Firm Performance: An Integrated MCDM Approach. Journal of Business Research, 114, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.028
Yücenur, G. N., Vayvay, Ö., & Demirel, N. Ç. (2011). Supplier Selection Problem in Global Supply Chains by AHP and ANP Approaches under Fuzzy Environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 56, 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3220-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3220-y
Zekhnini, K., Cherrafi, A., Bouhaddou, I., & Benghabrit, Y. (2021). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Supply Chain 4.0 Risks Management. In: T. Masrour, A. Cherrafi, I. El Hassani (Eds), Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Applications: Smart Operation Management (pp. 89–102). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51186-9_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51186-9_7
Zulqarnain, R. M., Xin, X. L., Siddique, I., Asghar Khan, W., & Yousif, M. A. (2021). TOPSIS Method Based on Correlation Coefficient under Pythagorean Fuzzy Soft Environment and Its Application towards Green Supply Chain Management. Sustainability, 13(4), 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041642
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Krakow University of Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
